Inovair Turbo Blower vs. P.D. Blower

Blower Model	Material Conveyed	psi Line Pressure	KW (avg)	Energy Savings
PD Blower Inovair Turbo Blower	Flour Flour	11.4 11.4	43.5 32.7	24.8%
PD Blower Inovair Turbo Blower	Plastic Pellets Plastic Pellets	10.1 11.9	33.3 21.4	35.7%
PD Blower Inovair Turbo Blower	Flour Flour	10 10	39 27	30.8%
PD Blower Inovair Turbo Blower	CaCo3 Filled Pellet CaCo3 Filled Pellet	7.3 7.7	26.1 19.7	24.5%
PD Blower Inovair Turbo Blower	CaCo3 Filled Pellet CaCo3 Filled Pellet	10.4 11.0	70.7 45.1	36.2%
PD Blower Inovair Turbo Blower	Mill Feed Mill Feed	9.3 9.3	36.5 30.4	16.7%
PD Blower Inovair Turbo Blower	Plastic Pellets Plastic Pellets	7.0 7.6	25.5 19.2	24.7%
PD Blower Inovair Turbo Blower	Canola Seed Canola Seed	9.4 10.1	31.1 21.3	31.5%
PD Blower Inovair Turbo Blower	Flour Flour	7 7	21.6 17.8	17.6%
PD Blower Inovair Turbo Blower	Flour Flour	13.5 13.3	53.1 37.2	29.8%

Note: Data (above) obtained during 2009 –11 side by side comparison at customer sites Inovair Turbo Blower is capable of producing up to 22 psi, and even greater energy savings

Savings Increase With Pressure

•Modern centrifugals are substantially more efficient than Positive Displacement (PD) blowers
•The operating efficiency of PD blowers declines as pressure increases, enhancing the centrifugal efficiency advantage
•In the typical PD operating range of 5-12 psi*, centrifugal energy saving range from 10 to 35%+
•The Iηovair 2200 is also capable of much higher pressure levels (~22 psi)

Pressure (psi)